Get Started
AI Visibility Report · South Africa · Q3 2026

AI Visibility Report Q3 2026

The South African AI Visibility Report is the most extensive measurement of AI brand recommendations conducted in South Africa to date: 3,415 AI answers and 17,921 source citations analysed across 19 industries and more than 260 brands, now tracked quarter on quarter.

19
industries analysed
260+
brands tracked
3,415
AI answers captured
17,921
source citations logged
Published Q3 2026 · Last updated Q3 2026
What we found

The headline findings

  • Three industries have a new AI leader since Q2 2026: OUTsurance in short-term insurance, EasyEquities in investment and asset management, and Eduvos in private tertiary education.
  • The AI shortlist got shorter: when the assistants rank providers, their lists now average 3.7 places, down from 4.8, so the top positions are worth more than ever.
  • Category leaders strengthened: the median leader now scores 53.7/100 (Q2: 48.3), and only 2 of 19 industries are still wide open (Q2: 5). No brand scores above 75; the strongest is MTN in mobile networks at 63.9.
  • Household names are mentioned often but recommended rarely: Cell C (mobile networks), Frogfoot and MetroFibre (fibre networks), Absa (SME banking) and Nedbank (retail banking) are named in most answers yet seldom the actual recommendation.
  • The assistants lean on a small set of sources: mybroadband.co.za was cited in 403 answers across 14 industries, with BusinessTech, Wikipedia, RateWeb and Hippo also shaping answers.
Q3 vs Q2

What changed since Q2 2026

Three new AI leaders, eight industries where the race changed shape, and the brands making real strides.

See how AI recommendations changed →

Key findings at a glance

Who AI recommends in each South African industry

The brand each assistant most often puts forward when a South African asks for the best option, scored 0-100. Click an industry for the full league table.

IndustryAI's most-recommended brandQuality ScoreRace status
Mobile NetworksMTN63.9/100Clear leader
Fibre ISPsAfrihost62.9/100Clear leader
Car BrandsToyota60.5/100Clear leader
Payment ProvidersPayfast60.5/100Clear leader
Betting and GamingBetway60.1/100Clear leader
Commercial / Corporate BanksStandard Bank59.9/100Clear leader
Vehicle TrackingCartrack58.9/100Competitive field
Business / SME BanksFNB57.4/100Clear leader
Private BanksInvestec55.8/100Clear leader
Business and Commercial InsuranceSantam53.7/100Clear leader
Fibre Network Operators (FNOs)Openserve51.5/100Competitive field (statistical tie with Vumatel)
Medical SchemesDiscovery Health51.4/100Competitive field
Retail BanksCapitec50.3/100Competitive field
Estate AgenciesPam Golding47.7/100Competitive field
Life and Long-Term InsuranceDiscovery Life41.4/100Competitive field
Investment and Asset ManagementEasyEquities (new leader)39.9/100Competitive field
Short-Term Insurers (Car & Home)OUTsurance (new leader)35.1/100Competitive field
Private Tertiary EducationEduvos (new leader)30.0/100Wide open
IT Managed Services and Systems IntegratorsNTT27.4/100Wide open (statistical tie with BCX)
Read the one-line finding for every industry
  • In Mobile Networks, MTN leads AI recommendations with a Quality Score of 63.9/100, while Cell C is named often but recommended rarely. Since Q2 2026, gaining ground: MTN, Shoprite K'nect.
  • In Fibre ISPs, Afrihost leads AI recommendations with a Quality Score of 62.9/100. Since Q2 2026, gaining ground: Afrihost, Cool Ideas, MWEB, Supersonic; losing ground: Telkom.
  • In Car Brands, Toyota leads AI recommendations with a Quality Score of 60.5/100, while Hyundai is named often but recommended rarely. Since Q2 2026, gaining ground: Suzuki; losing ground: Renault, Nissan.
  • In Payment Providers, Payfast leads AI recommendations with a Quality Score of 60.5/100. Since Q2 2026, gaining ground: Yoco, Paystack, Stitch; losing ground: Paygate, SnapScan, Zapper.
  • In Betting and Gaming, Betway leads AI recommendations with a Quality Score of 60.1/100. Since Q2 2026, gaining ground: World Sports Betting, YesPlay; losing ground: Easybet, Gbets, Betfred, Zarbet.
  • In Commercial / Corporate Banks, Standard Bank leads AI recommendations with a Quality Score of 59.9/100. Since Q2 2026, gaining ground: RMB.
  • In Vehicle Tracking, Cartrack leads AI recommendations with a Quality Score of 58.9/100. Since Q2 2026, gaining ground: Tracker, Netstar, MiX Telematics.
  • In Business / SME Banks, FNB leads AI recommendations with a Quality Score of 57.4/100, while Absa is named often but recommended rarely. Since Q2 2026, gaining ground: Bank Zero; losing ground: TymeBank, Absa, African Bank.
  • In Private Banks, Investec leads AI recommendations with a Quality Score of 55.8/100. Since Q2 2026, gaining ground: FNB Private, Nedbank Private Wealth; losing ground: Absa Private Bank.
  • In Business and Commercial Insurance, Santam leads AI recommendations with a Quality Score of 53.7/100. Since Q2 2026, gaining ground: OUTsurance, Hollard, Bryte; losing ground: Momentum.
  • In Fibre Network Operators (FNOs), Openserve leads AI recommendations with a Quality Score of 51.5/100, while MetroFibre and Frogfoot are named often but recommended rarely. No brand moved beyond normal variation since Q2 2026.
  • In Medical Schemes, Discovery Health leads AI recommendations with a Quality Score of 51.4/100. Since Q2 2026, gaining ground: Fedhealth; losing ground: Genesis Medical Scheme, KeyHealth.
  • In Retail Banks, Capitec leads AI recommendations with a Quality Score of 50.3/100. Since Q2 2026, losing ground: Nedbank, African Bank.
  • In Estate Agencies, Pam Golding leads AI recommendations with a Quality Score of 47.7/100. Since Q2 2026, gaining ground: Rawson, Lew Geffen Sotheby's, Fine & Country.
  • In Life and Long-Term Insurance, Discovery Life leads AI recommendations with a Quality Score of 41.4/100. Since Q2 2026, gaining ground: Discovery Life, PPS, BrightRock, AllLife; losing ground: Absa Life.
  • In Investment and Asset Management, EasyEquities leads AI recommendations with a Quality Score of 39.9/100. New this quarter: EasyEquities has taken the lead from Allan Gray. Since Q2 2026, gaining ground: EasyEquities, Sygnia, 10X, PSG, M&G Investments; losing ground: Ninety One, Stanlib.
  • In Short-Term Insurers (Car & Home), OUTsurance leads AI recommendations with a Quality Score of 35.1/100. New this quarter: OUTsurance has taken the lead from Santam. Since Q2 2026, gaining ground: King Price, Naked, Pineapple; losing ground: Santam.
  • In Private Tertiary Education, the assistants have no clear favourite yet - Eduvos only leads on a low Quality Score of 30.0/100, leaving the category wide open. New this quarter: Eduvos has taken the lead from Varsity College. Since Q2 2026, gaining ground: STADIO, Vega School, Milpark Education, AFDA, SACAP, Henley Business School, Regenesys; losing ground: Damelin.
  • In IT Managed Services and Systems Integrators, the assistants have no clear favourite yet - NTT only leads on a low Quality Score of 27.4/100, leaving the category wide open. Since Q2 2026, gaining ground: Gijima; losing ground: iOCO, Zinia.
What the score means

The AI Visibility Quality Score

The AI Visibility Quality Score is a 0-100 measure of how strongly AI assistants put a brand forward. It combines how often the brand is mentioned with the rank position it is given in each answer, averaged across all 180 AI answers per industry (20 buyer-intent questions, asked to three assistants, repeated three times). Answers that do not name the brand count as zero. Whether a brand is actively recommended or merely listed is reported separately, as the Mentioned vs. Recommended measure.

Why this matters

How AI is changing brand discovery

South African buyers increasingly open their search not on Google but inside an AI assistant - "what is the best provider for me?" The assistant answers with a short, confident list. The brands it names enter the consideration set; the brands left off never get a chance. This report measures who the assistants name, recommend and rank across the industries South Africans buy in. For the wider shift behind these numbers, see how AI search is changing traffic.

What we measured

How the report was built

We asked ChatGPT (OpenAI), Claude (Anthropic) and Gemini (Google) - each with live web search enabled, and each on the model a South African gets by default - the real buyer-intent questions South Africans ask. Twenty questions per industry, asked to three assistants, repeated three times each: 180 answers per industry, 3,415 in total, collected during October 2026. For every answer we captured which brands were mentioned, which were actively recommended, and where they ranked, then scored each brand on the 0-100 Quality Score. The same questions are asked every quarter, so movement can be tracked.

Read the full methodology →

The sources AI reads

Which websites shape AI answers about South African brands

Across all 19 industries, these are the domains the assistants cited most often. Earning presence on these sources is one of the most direct ways to influence what AI recommends.

Source domainTimes citedIndustries
mybroadband.co.za40314
businesstech.co.za32915
en.wikipedia.org27717
www.rateweb.co.za25113
www.hippo.co.za22511
www.capitecbank.co.za2158
www.discovery.co.za2119
www.investec.com2097
www.fnb.co.za2037
www.standardbank.co.za1998
www.reddit.com19816
www.autotrader.co.za1952
www.govchain.co.za1674
fastestfibre.co.za1633
www.outsurance.co.za1584
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is the South African AI Visibility Report?

It is a quarterly study by MO Agency measuring how the leading AI assistants - ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini - recommend brands to South African buyers. The Q3 2026 edition analysed 3,415 AI answers and 17,921 source citations across 19 industries and more than 260 brands, scoring each brand on a 0-100 AI Visibility Quality Score.

What is an AI Visibility Quality Score?

The AI Visibility Quality Score is a 0-100 measure of how strongly AI assistants put a brand forward. It combines how often the brand is mentioned with the rank position it is given in each answer, averaged across all 180 AI answers per industry (20 buyer-intent questions, asked to three assistants, repeated three times). Answers that do not name the brand count as zero. Whether a brand is actively recommended or merely listed is reported separately, as the Mentioned vs. Recommended measure.

Which AI assistants were tested?

ChatGPT (OpenAI), Claude (Anthropic) and Gemini (Google), each with live web search enabled and each on the model a South African gets by default, asked the real buyer-intent questions South Africans ask.

How can a brand improve its visibility in AI answers?

Brands improve AI visibility through Answer Engine Optimisation (AEO): publishing clear, structured, citable content, strong entity and schema markup, and authoritative third-party sources the assistants read. MO Agency offers AEO services to close these gaps.

Cite this report

Reference

Cite this report: MO Agency (2026). The South African AI Visibility Report, Q3 2026. https://www.mo.agency/ai-visibility-report-south-africa

See your brand's AI visibility

Find out where your brand stands in AI answers - and how to become the one ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini recommend.

Get your AI visibility audit
Prepared by MO Agency. Powered by Getmd.ai.
The South African AI Visibility Report 2026 · MO Agency · Q3 2026